www.www.buonovino.com

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FORUM OF INDIA [SEFI]

Forum SubscriptionsSubscriptionsDigestDigest PreferencesFAQFAQSearchSearchMemberlistMemberlistUsergroupsUsergroupsRegisterRegisterFAQ安全提示FAQDonate
ProfileProfileLog in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messagesLog in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to websiteLog in to forum
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools before opening them. They may contain viruses.
Use online scanners
here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.

[e-Conf] Clause 6.3.3 Single Angles in Draft IS:800

This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.这个话题被锁定:你不能edit posts or make replies. www.www.buonovino.com Forum Index->E-Conference 23rd Sept 2003
View previous topic::View next topic
Author Message
er_spsvasan
SEFI Member
SEFI Member


Joined: 26 Jan 2003
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2003 3:18 amPost subject: [e-Conf] Clause 6.3.3 Single Angles in Draft IS:800 Reply with quote

Hello everybody,

My doubt is regarding the value of alpha as defined
below the second expression for Tdn.(Clause 6.3.3
Single Angles)

Alpha is defined as "0.6 for one or two bolts, 0.7 for
three bolts, and 0.8 for four or more bolts in the end
connection or equivalent weld length"

How do we interpret "or equivalent weld length"?
Equivalence between weld length and no of bolts will
get influenced by diameter of bolts and by the throat
thickness of the weld.

If a welded joint is provided, how do we calculate
alpha?

Regards
S.P.Srinivasan

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner online.
Go tohttp://yahoo.shaadi.com

Posted via Email
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
spsvasan at eth.net
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2003 6:02 amPost subject: [e-Conf] Clause 6.3.3 Single Angles in Draft IS:800 Reply with quote

Hello everybody,

This is in continuation of my earlier e-mail on the above topic

After a more careful study of clause 6.3.3, I understand that Tdn, the
design strength due to rupture of critical section is not applicable to
welded joints since there are no holes at a welded joint. But I still
cannot understand the presence of the term "or equivalent weld length" in
the definition for alpha.

Regards
S.P.Srinivasan

Posted via Email
Back to top
Display posts from previous:
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.这个话题被锁定:你不能edit posts or make replies. www.www.buonovino.com Forum Index->E-Conference 23rd Sept 2003 All times are GMT
Page1of1



Jump to:
Youcannotpost new topics in this forum
Youcannotreply to topics in this forum
Youcannotedit your posts in this forum
Youcannotdelete your posts in this forum
Youcannotvote in polls in this forum
Youcanattach files in this forum
Youcandownload files in this forum


© 2003, 2008 SEFINDIA,Indian Domain Registration
Publishing or acceptance of an advertisement is neither a guarantee nor endorsement of the advertiser's product or service.advertisement policy
Baidu
map