www.www.buonovino.com

[manish_nith]

Hi Sefians,

I am trying to design a fixed base plate as per Chapter 12 of IS:800. As per my understanding following are the load cases I am considering while designing the base plate: (Column and Brace sections are considered Plastic sections)



(Please refer to attachment incase above pic is not visible in post)

Request your feedback on my understanding.

If someone can guide me to some solved example or some book that would be great help.

Regards
Manish Jain

[manish_nith]

Hi Sefians,
I am trying to design a fixed base plate as perChapter 12 of IS:800. As per my understanding following are the load cases I am considering while designing the base plate: (Column and Brace sections are considered Plastic sections)









(Please refer to attachment incase above pic is not visible in post) Request your feedback on my understanding.
If someone can guide me to some solved example or some book that would be great help.
Regards
Manish Jain

Posted via Email

[arulsteel2]

Dear Friends


Chapter 12 of IS: 800 is being revised and rationalized.� The EQ provisions in IS:800 is likely to be a�separate�part of IS:1893. When there was a wide circulation of that, very few responded.


Designers wish to exchange reliability for the economy. The clients often specify the cap on the steel tonnage and then ask the designers to design within that bracket. I faced the same issue in the design of a major project.� We must sensitize the clients�that the reliability baseline cannot be lowered.�


因为这类修正开始流行起来,我们可以to extend the usage of IS:800 for EQ provisions.


On first look, the design combinations�appear to be correct.


Warm regardsArul Jayachandran, Professor
IIT Madras






On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 9:02 AM manish_nith forum@www.buonovino.com) >写道:

[sanjay puranik]

The IS 800 chapter 12 is an atrocity From: "arulsteel2" Sent: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 10:25:19To:general@www.buonovino.comSubject: [SEFI] Base Plate Design as per Chapter 12 of IS:800Dear FriendsChapter 12 of IS: 800 is being revised and rationalized. The EQ provisions in IS:800 is likely to be a separate part of IS:1893. When there was a wide circulation of that, very few responded.Designers wish to exchange reliability for the economy. The clients often specify the cap on the steel tonnage and then ask the designers to design within that bracket. I faced the same issue in the design of a major project. We must sensitize the clients that the reliability baseline cannot be lowered. Since such revisions come into vogue, we may have to extend the usage of IS:800 for EQ provisions.On first look, the design combinations appear to be correct.Warm regardsArul Jayachandran, ProfessorIIT MadrasOn Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 9:02�€�AM manish_nith wrote:——自动删除

Posted via Email