JMSSNL at ltecd.ltindi... Guest
|
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2003 2:25 pmPost subject: Load combinations involving Crane load |
 |
|
亲爱的先生,
For Industrial structures design ,Crane load is considered as Occasional load since crane may not be operating with full capacity all the time. Hence while combining with Wind/Seismic loads , building structure is designed for either ,
Reduced Wind/EQ load or Zero/reduced crane lifted load (Not wheel load) with full wind/Seismic load.
这个规定在本质上是概率的和ries across codes.
For example Article 1612.3.2 of Section 1612 of UBC-1997 states "Crane hook loads need not be combined with roof live load or with more than three fourth of snow load or one half of the wind load". Load combination specified in Table 5.1 of IS:800 Draft (Line 2 ) matches with above criteria where WL/EL factor is specified as 0.6 ( 1.2 x 50 % WL ) with full crane load.
Alternate to this combination is another case where full wind/Seismic load is combined with zero/reduced crane lifted capacity.
IS:800:1984 (Article 3.4.2.5) as well as IS:800 draft (Article 3.5.5) makes statement " While investigating the effect of earthquake forces, the resulting effect from dead loads of all cranes parked in each bay positioned to cause maximum effect shall be considered."
This means that along with seismic only (emphasis mine) dead loads of cranes shall be considered ie. lifted load need not be considered.
Going to Table 5.1 of IS:800 Draft crane load factor specified is 0.53 with full seismic load.
To my understanding factor 0.53 is derived by 1.05 x 50 % crane wheel load. As we know wheel load is factor of (crab weight + bridge weight + lifted load )and only (crab weight + bridge weight) will not total to 50 % of maximum wheel load derived with full lifted capacity. This means part of lifted load is inbuilt in combination involving seismic load.
This shall not be a problem except that article 3.5.5 from draft code shall be removed to avoid confusion.
Also , since percentage of lifted load that get inbuilt is unknown , determining transverse surge loads under this condition will involve some back calculation.. Surge load is dependent only on crab weight and lifted load, which needs to be extracted from wheel load calculated above.
In order to avoid this problem, a better solution will be to specify percentage of lifted load to be used with Wind/Seismic. I have come across some international norms which specifies 50 % lifted load with wind and 20 % lifted load with seismic load.
Other members of SEFI can opine on my suggestion
Thanks,
Jignesh shah L&T-S&L
Posted via Email |
|