| View previous topic::View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hemalmistry
...
Joined: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 70
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 6:59 pmPost subject: clause 8.1.3.3.1 and clause 9.6 |
 |
|
| Clause 8.1.3.3.1 permits to exclude backstay effect for tall buildings with seismic joint between tower and podium. However, clause 9.6 requires to avoid expansion joint in basement of tall building. Does it meen that seismic joint can be provided but expansion joint can not be provided? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pushpinder84
Progressive Member
Joined: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 46
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:42 amPost subject: |
|
|
Clause 9.6 refers to the expansion joints within the building as opposed to the separation joint between the building and the podium. Closing of this joint will result in analysis similar to 8.1.3.3.3 (towers connected by podium) and not 8.1.3.3.1.
Regards
Pushpinder Chauhan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Subscriptions
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Donate
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in to website
